Roe v. Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel and for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37” [Doc. No. 62] (“Mot.”) filed February 6, 2012. Although the motion touches on the ultimate propriety of defense counsel’s attempt to create an attorney/client privilege between himself and any and all witnesses in the case for the purpose of preventing plaintiffs counsel from having fair access to fact witnesses, the only issue ripe for resolution at this stage is whether “1) emails sent by Centura Health’s HR Department or Kutak…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hedquist v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2016
- Amann v. Office of the Utah Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- Anduin Lightner, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Davita, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2026
- Chavez v. Lake County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Collardey v. Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.