In re Grand Jury Subpoena
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
*133 MEMORANDUM
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
By Order dated February 25, 2004 [Doc. No. 10, M.B.D. No. 04-10040-WGY], this Court DENIED two Motions for a Protective Order [Doc. Nos. 3 and 5, M.B.D. No. 04-10040-WGY]. This Memorandum sets forth the analysis that led to the Court’s order.
II. BACKGROUND
This case involves a federal grand jury investigation of a corporation’s distribution in interstate commerce of an allegedly adulterated and misbranded device, in violation of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-97. The grand jury issued an investigatory subpoena duces…
2Cases cited140 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Commissioner of Revenue v. Comcast Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Crosby v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.