Legal Opinion

In re Grand Jury Subpoena

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 16, 2004No. M.B.D. 04-10040-WGYPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*133 MEMORANDUM

YOUNG, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

By Order dated February 25, 2004 [Doc. No. 10, M.B.D. No. 04-10040-WGY], this Court DENIED two Motions for a Protective Order [Doc. Nos. 3 and 5, M.B.D. No. 04-10040-WGY]. This Memorandum sets forth the analysis that led to the Court’s order.

II. BACKGROUND

This case involves a federal grand jury investigation of a corporation’s distribution in interstate commerce of an allegedly adulterated and misbranded device, in violation of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-97. The grand jury issued an investigatory subpoena duces…

2Cases cited140 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Commissioner of Revenue v. Comcast Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Crosby v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API