Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated Dec. 18, 1981, Etc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 20, 1982No. 82 Civ. 0234, 0286PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
SUMMARY
Two motions have been made to quash certain subpoenas. On June 16, 1982, I issued a preliminary order to expedite the grand jury proceeding to which the motions apply. The order contained only my findings and indicated that a final memorandum and order, including an extensive discussion of the law and how it relates to the subpoenaed documents, would follow. The following constitutes my final memorandum and order.
These are my findings:
A. The following document is protected, and therefore not discoverable:
Walco Document 3
3. The following…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Bank Brussels Lambert v. Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Viacom, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.