Legal Opinion
Canode v. Claypool & Wheeler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1922No. 12976PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This action was commenced in this court by Walter Canode against Clay-pool & Wheeler and Associated Employers’ Reciprocal to' reverse an order of the Industrial Commission denying the petitioner compensation against his employers, Claypool & Wheeler, and Associated Employers’ Reciprocal, as insurance carrier. The order of the commission was dated the 17th day of December, 1921, and was based upon testimony taken before the commission on July 26, 1921. The commission found that the claimant was an employe of Claypool & Wheeler and received an accidental injury in the nature of a burn on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Kibby v. BinionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Wilson Lumber Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Nance v. FoutsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. BushongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Rigdon v. Claypool & WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Bond Marble & Tile Office v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.