Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 12, 1924No. 14731PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
On June 6, 1923, the plaintiff in error filed his claim before the State Industrial Commission for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Laws of Oklahoma for loss sustained by reason of an alleged injury to_ his back occasioned by lifting certain tools while he was in the employ of the Magnolia Petroleum Company, and from the judgment of the commission, refusing to award him compensation for that the injuries were not received while in the performance of his duties as an employe of the Magnolia Petroleum Company, and, therefore, the commission had no jurisdiction,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ohio Drilling Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- McAlester Colliery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Sun Coal Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Chestnut Smith v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Superior Smokeless Coal & Mining Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Pryor v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Cook v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Muskogee Iron Works v. GoetzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933