Legal Opinion
Bond Marble & Tile Office v. Rose
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 11, 1958No. 37668PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARLILE, Justice.
On the 6th day of September, 1955, Homer L. Rose, respondent herein, filed a claim for compensation against Bond Marble & Tile Office and its insurance carrier, Utilities Insurance Company, petitioners herein, in which he states that on May 3, 1955, while in the employ of respondent, Bond Marble & Tile Office, he sustained an accidental injury consisting of injury to his right shoulder and elbow and lower back, causing some disability to his person. The accident occurred while he was engaged in the unloading of a car of tile from a parked freight car belonging to the St.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Deshazer v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Ex Parte WillisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Noble Drilling Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prettyman v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Hornback v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Utilities Insurance Company v. Keller A. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Weiss v. Salvation ArmySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Coker-Mitchell Company v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.