Nance v. Fouts
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Custer County; Thos. A. Edwards, Judge. Action by N. F. Fouts and Perry Reynolds, as administrators of the estate of Shoe Boy, an Indian, deceásed, against Alice Nance, administratrix, and Ohas. W. Hood-win, administrator, of the estate of T. J. Nance, deceased. Judgment for plaintiffs on the pleadings after mandate, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This cause was before the Supreme Court on a former appeal; the -opinion handed down at that time being reported in 55 Okla. 2,(53, 155 Pac. 610. As the opinion formerly handed down sufficiently discloses che issues involved in the controversy foi our present purpose, we will not make a restatement of the l’ecord here, except in so far as we may find it necessary for a clear understanding of the specific proposition under discussion.
On the -former appeal the judgment in favor of the defendants, plaintiffs in error here, was reversed, and the cause remanded, “with instructions to the trial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Fouts v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Canode v. Claypool & WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Globe Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Hill v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Smith v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.