Legal Opinion
Rigdon v. Claypool & Wheeler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1922No. 12977PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This proceeding was instituted in this court by George B. Rigdon against Claypool & Wheeler, Associated Employers' Reciprocal, and the State Industrial Commission to reverse an order of the Industrial Commission denying the claimant compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The questions involved are identical with the case of Walter Canode v. Claypool & Wheeler et al. (No. 12976. this day decided), 86 Okla. 262, 207 Pac. 974, and the questions there decided control the questions involved in this case.
Tire order of the Industrial Commission is affirmed upon authority of the case of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Canode v. Claypool & WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. BushongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Bond Marble & Tile Office v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Parsons v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.