Legal Opinion
St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Matthews
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 10, 1935No. 24190PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by plaintiff in error, defendant below, from an adverse judgment of the district court of Creek county, Okla., entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of defendant in error, plaintiff below. A proper understanding of the questions involved requires a summary statement of the proceedings in the trial court.
In her second amended petition, upon which the ease proceeded to trial, plaintiff alleges in substance, that during the period from August 1,1922, the approximate date upon which defendant first began using oil-burning locomotives in the city of Sapulpa, Okla., up to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Page v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Model LaundrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- British-American Oil Producing Co. v. McClainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. DunkelbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Fairfax Oil Co. v. BolingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.