Legal Opinion
CALIFORNIA RANCH HOMES DEVELOPMENT CO. OF HEMET v. San Jacinto Unified Sch. Dist.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 13, 1993No. E010693PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DABNEY, J.
The San Jacinto Unified School District (School District) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of California Ranch Homes Development Company of Hemet (CRH) on CRH’s petition for writ of mandate. The judgment required the School District to refund to CRH school impact fees totaling $73,143.20 plus interest. On appeal, the School District contends the court erred in determining that the School District had improperly collected school impact fees at the residential rate instead of at the lower rate applicable to senior citizen housing. The School District also contends…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Balch Enterprises, Inc. v. New Haven Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Anza Parking Corp. v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Trend Homes, Inc. v. Central Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- RRLH, Inc. v. Saddleback Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gonzalez v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- N.T. Hill Inc. v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Merkoh Associates, LLC v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016