Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. County of Tulare

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1998No. F025954PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DIBIASO, Acting P. J.

Appellants Margarito Gonzalez and Ronnie Castillo appeal from an order sustaining, without leave to amend, a demurrer to their petition for administrative mandamus. The trial court agreed with respondents County of Tulare, Tulare County Board of Supervisors and Tulare County Planning Commission that although appellants had timely filed their mandate petition they had not timely served it. The mandamus proceeding followed appellants’ unsuccessful objections to the issuance of conditional use permits and the enactment of a zoning ordinance pertaining to certain real…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Honig v. San Francisco Planning DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Rothschild v. Tyco Internationall (US), Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Walt Rankin & Associates, Inc. v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. v. City of IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API