Legal Opinion

Application of David Taub, Norman L. Wendler and Harry L. Slates

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 19, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7336PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Appellants lost in interference a generic count that includes species of phara-ceutically active steroids which they now claim in an application serial No. 831,-688, filed August 5, 1959 for “Steroid Production.”

The steroids of the present invention:

* * * possess extremely high anti-inflammatory activity, * * * and are especially effective for the treatment of arthritis and related diseases since they can be administered for their cortisone-like action in extremely low dosage thereby minimizing undesired side effects.

* «• *

The steroids claimed are distinguished by the presence…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re GreggCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. In re RuffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Application of KyridesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. In Re ColeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  5. In Re SolaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Scott T. JolleyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. In Re Alex ZletzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. In re BassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, Ulrich Horlein and Wolfgang Wirth. Application of Ulrich Horlein, Wolfgang Wirth and Klaus Heinz RisseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API