Legal Opinion
Sutter Products Company v. Pettibone Mulliken Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 5, 1970No. 17806_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Sutter Products Company manufactures foundry equipment in Holly, Michigan. It charges that the Flexiblomatic machines manufactured by Pettibone Mulliken Corporation’s Beardsley & Piper Division in Chicago, Illinois, infringe the apparatus claim of Sutter Patent No. 2,856,653. Plaintiff also asserts infringement of apparatus claim 3 of Sutter Patent No. 2,867,017 by another of defendant’s machines which removes finished articles from the Flexiblomatics. 2 In addition to the apparatus claims, Sutter charges that the operations of defendant’s machines infringe…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. BrennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- The Dunlop Company, Limited, and Cross-Appellee v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Eaton Corp. v. Appliance Valves Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Jamesbury Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- In re BassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.