Legal Opinion

Kearns v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1985No. 2997 and 2998PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Dr. William R. Clark performed a hysterectomy for Elizabeth Jane Kearns at the Riddle Memorial Hospital. He was assisted by Dr. Johnson, an employee of the hospital. Eight days later, after Mrs. Kearns had continued to complain of pain, it was discovered that she had a blocked ureter. This, it was shown, had been caused by a wayward suture placed in the ureter. The left kidney thereafter became diseased and died, and it became necessary to remove the same. Mrs. Kearns and her husband filed separate actions against Dr. Clark and the hospital, which were consolidated and tried…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Ragan v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Merck, Sharp & DohmeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Smith v. RenautSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. White v. Kent Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Butler v. KIWI, SASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API