Legal Opinion

Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical Center

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1989No. 2090, 2091, 2338 and 2339PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this medical malpractice action, the trial court awarded a new trial on motion of the defendant-health care providers because of an erroneous evidentiary ruling which permitted a witness to testify that when the plaintiff-patient was examined by a non-testifying physician, the physician asked, “Who’s the butcher who [did] this?” On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that the physician’s declaration was properly received and did not warrant a new trial. In a cross-appeal, the defendant-health care providers argue that the trial court should have entered a judgment n.o.v. in their…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Brannan v. Lankenau HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Ragan v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Primavera v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Pirozzi v. Penske Olds-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Cohen v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Corrado v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API