Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical Center
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this medical malpractice action, the trial court awarded a new trial on motion of the defendant-health care providers because of an erroneous evidentiary ruling which permitted a witness to testify that when the plaintiff-patient was examined by a non-testifying physician, the physician asked, “Who’s the butcher who [did] this?” On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that the physician’s declaration was properly received and did not warrant a new trial. In a cross-appeal, the defendant-health care providers argue that the trial court should have entered a judgment n.o.v. in their…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Brannan v. Lankenau HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Ragan v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Primavera v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pirozzi v. Penske Olds-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Cohen v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Corrado v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.