Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1987No. 149PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this trespass action, plaintiff-appellant, Constance L. McDaniel, as Administratrix of the Estate of Carol M. Lee, appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County denying her post-trial motions for the removal of a compulsory non-suit and judgment n.o.v. as to appellee, Merck, Sharp & Dohme (hereinafter Merck), and denying motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v. as to appellees, Dr. John H. Goodworth, Dr. Timothy Kavic, and Western Pennsylvania Hospital (hereinafter West Penn). We reverse and remand this case to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Waye v. First Citizen's National BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Houston v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Chanthavong v. TranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API