Legal Opinion

Agricultural Insurance Co. of Watertown v. Iglehart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1963No. 39600PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Vice Chief Justice.

Paul Iglehart, plaintiff, commenced this action against Agricultural Insurance Company of Watertown, N. Y., defendant, to recover upon a policy of fire insurance. Judgment upon a jury verdict was entered in favor of plaintiff for the full amount of the policy, $10,000. Defendant brings this appeal. The parties will be referred to by their trial court designations.

The insured property which burned was a business building and fixtures in Fort Towson, Oklahoma.

Defendant’s first proposition of error is that plaintiff’s action was barred by limitations. The fire occurred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. George v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. In Re Free's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Bernstein v. Connecticut Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Meriwether v. BowlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hounshell v. American States InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Mello v. Hingham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Dominish v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Elliano v. Assurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Warrilow v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API