Legal Opinion

Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1944No. 30922PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover under the terms of a standard form fire insurance policy for damage to lithographic engraving stones alleged to have been caused by fire.

The policy under which plaintiff based its right to recovery contained the following provision:

“No suit or action on this policy, for the recovery of any claim, shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity until after full compliance by the insured with all the foregoing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Dahrooge v. Rochester German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Dickirson v. the Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Northwestern Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gould v. Transamerican AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Fletcher v. Meadow Gold CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Agricultural Insurance Co. of Watertown v. IglehartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Anderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Insurance Co. Of North America v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 12, Texas County, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API