Legal Opinion

Dominish v. Nationwide Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2011No. 2010-1431PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} The issue in this case is whether Nationwide Insurance Company can enforce the limitation-of-action clause contained in its insurance contract. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that it can.

Factual and Procedural Background

{¶ 2} On July 28, 2006, a storm caused a tree to fall and damage a house owned by appellee, Dennis J. Dominish. 1 Dominish submitted a claim to his insurance company, appellant, Nationwide Insurance Company. Nationwide investigated, assessed the damage, and twice issued a check to Dominish in the amount of $6,741.96. Both times that Dominish received a check,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hounshell v. American States InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Faruque v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. SandsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Agricultural Insurance Co. of Watertown v. IglehartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Marusa v. Erie InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Engleson v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. Tera, L.L.C. v. Rice Drilling D., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Offill v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Shafer v. Newman Ins. AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API