Legal Opinion

Mello v. Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 10, 1995PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

The plaintiffs, Americo and Maria Mello, commenced this action against Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Hingham) in the Superior Court on April 26, 1994, to recover policy proceeds for fire loss. Hingham moved for summary judgment alleging that Americo Mello’s failure to submit to an examination under oath, as required both by the policy and G. L. c. 175, § 99, Twelfth (1994 ed.), constituted a material breach of the fire insurance policy, thus barring recovery under the policy. The plaintiff asserted that his refusal to submit to the examination was justified because he had become the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Van Dyke v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Blaisdell v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. BowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Custody of Two MinorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Colley v. Benson, Young & Downs InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Lorenzo-Martinez v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Hodnett v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Rymsha v. Trust InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API