George v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kay County; Wm. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by William George and another against the Connecticut Eire Insurance Company, of Hartford, Conn., on fire insurance policy. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
On December 18, 1911, Joe George, one of the plaintiffs in error in this suit, sustained a loss by fire. The property so lost was insured under an insurance policy issued by the Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, of Hartford, Connecticut, a corporation, which is the defendant in error in this suit.
On the 3rd day of January, 1912, Joe George assigned his interests under said policy to William George, who appears as the other plaintiff in error herein. Shortly after said loss, the insurance company demanded of Joe George that he submit to an examination pertaining to the property insured and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hill v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hamilton v. Royal Insurance Co. of Liverpool, EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Hayden v. . PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Titus v. . PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Wilkinson v. First National Fire Insurance Co. of WorcesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Weininger v. Metropolitan Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. SwydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Wade v. Hope & KillingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Cowokochee v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Agricultural Insurance Co. of Watertown v. IglehartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.