Legal Opinion

People v. O'NEAL

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1934No. Crim. 1392PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendants were jointly charged under the provisions of section 211 of the Penal Code with the crime of robbery committed by feloniously taking an automobile from the possession of the owner thereof by the exercise of force. In the same information O’Neal was charged with three prior convictions of other felonies. Each defendant pleaded not guilty of the present charge of robbery. O’Neal admitted two of the charges of prior convictions of felonies. He denied that he was previously convicted in Montana on a charge of murder of the second degree. The defendants were jointly tried with a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. MuhlnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. Sing YowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. CovingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. In Re ColfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. RanerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. People v. SaffellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. CrowlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API