Legal Opinion

People v. Crowl

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1938No. Crim. 364PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment pronounced on defendant after a jury had found him guilty of robbery in the first degree, and from the order denying his motion for new trial.

Defendant and his nephew, Lloyd Growl, were arrested for the robbery of C. M. Johnson, committed on February 3, 1938, on the highway leading from Needles to San Bernardino. Lloyd Growl was a minor of the age of sixteen years. He was certified to the juvenile court and was not made a defendant in this action.

Defendant relies upon the following grounds for reversal of the judgment: (1) That the evidence was insufficient…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Morgan v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API