Legal Opinion
People v. Saffell
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 1946No. Crim. A. 2170PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
The defendants are prosecuted in this criminal action on a complaint containing three counts. They filed a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled as to Counts I and III, and sustained as to Count II, with leave to amend. The People having failed to amend within the time allowed therefor, judgment of dismissal of Count II was entered, from which the People appeal. Such an appeal from the judgment entered on one count is proper although the other counts are not disposed of. (People v. Ring (1937), 26 Cal.App.2d Supp. 768, 770 [70 P.2d 281].)
At the threshold of our consideration of this…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067California Supreme Court · 1940
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. AgnelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People ex rel. Reisig v. Broderick BoysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.