Legal Opinion

People v. Raner

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1948No. Crim. 4200PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

By information, the defendants were charged with the crime of robbery while armed with a deadly weapon, to wit, a sawed-off .22 caliber rifle. Defendants pleaded guilty to the charge of robbery but denied having been armed, and waived a jury trial on that issue. By leave of court, an application for probation was filed by each defendant. At the close of the hearing which was had on the applications for probation and for the purpose of fixing the degree of the crime, the trial judge found that defendants had been “armed with a deadly weapon to wit an unloaded pistol at the time of the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. SylvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. WolcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. SkeirikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. In Re DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API