Radford v. Norris
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The only question presented is whether the court erred in instructing on contributory negligence. We hold that it did and award a new trial.
In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to justify submission of contributory negligence, we consider defendant’s evidence in the light most favorable to her, with all reasonable inferences therefrom, and disregard plaintiffs evidence except to the extent favorable to defendant. Jones v. Holt, 268 N.C. 381, 150 S.E. 2d 759 (1966). Evidence which merely raises a conjecture as to plaintiffs negligence will not support an instruction. Id.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Garner v. PittmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Michael Small v. Welldyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Hunt v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Whisnant v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Mobley v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.