Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1990No. Nos. 89-2315, 89-2316, 89-2331 and 89-2332PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated appeals involve claims of securities fraud and professional negligence arising from the sale of partnership interests in a real estate venture. The district court entered judgments on varying theories of liability against Interstate Securities Corporation; Interstate broker William Jordan; and attorney Michael Miller and his law firm, Roberts, Cogburn, McClure and Williams (hereafter Miller). Interstate and Miller appeal.1 We affirm as to Interstate, but reverse as to Miller and remand for a new trial.
I. Facts
The chain of events leading to this action…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,213 Hill York Corporation v. American International Franchises, Inc., Gurn H. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Helen C. Carras and Bill G. Carras, Co-Executors of the Estate of Gus N. Carras, Deceased v. James S. Burns, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Paul Anthony Cooper v. S. Dyke, Officer J.R. Markert, Officer C. Morseberger, Officer, Defendants- (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Michael E. Wallace, David Jacaruso and Joseph Scotti v. Daljit S. Buttar and Paramjit Buttar, Robert Winston, AdditionalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- United States v. Eugene Donald SchaltenbrandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Jadoff v. GleasonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1991
- Andrews v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.