Mobley v. Hill

EAGLES, Judge.

In this appeal defendant Walters assigns as error several evidentiary rulings, a ruling allowing an amendment to the pleadings, and denial of his directed verdict and judgment n.o.v. motions based on the insufficiency of the evidence. He has grouped them together in a somewhat confusing manner, in violation of our rule requiring that questions be stated separately. App. R. 28(b)(5). Nevertheless, we have carefully reviewed them. We find no prejudicial error.

I

We address first Walters’ argument that the court erred in allowing an amendment to the pleadings to conform them to the…