Legal Opinion

Lane v. Dorney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1960No. 593PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Pursuant to the petition and order entered by the two Justices to whom it was referred, the cases were reheard by the full Court. The parties filed new briefs and made extended oral arguments. The petition presents the questions whether the Court, in the original decision, committed errors of law in sustaining the judgment of nonsuit (1) by refusing to apply the rule res ipsa loquitur, and (2) by overlooking “the physical facts and direct testimony in the record . . . sufficient to raise an inference of negligence.”

The cases are now before us for our determination whether error of law was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Lane v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Kekelis v. Whitin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Radford v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API