Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
The challenge of each defendant to the judgment below is directed (1) to the ruling of court in refusing to grant motion made at close of all the evidence for judgment as in case of nonsuit, C. S., 567, and (2) to portions of the charge.
In considering the first, “defendant’s evidence unless favorable to the plaintiff, is not to be taken into consideration, except when not in conflict with the plaintiff’s evidence, it may be used to explain or make clear that which has been offered by the plaintiff.” Harrison v. R. R., 194 N. C., 656, 140 S. E., 598, and cases recently assembled in Jeffries v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Reeves v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Reeves v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Seiler v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Chaffin v. BrameSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Keener v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Cox v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.