Henderson v. Henderson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
In testing the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s evidence to require submission of the issue of negligence to the jury, certain well-established propositions must be kept in mind.
The general law as to what constitutes actionable negligence is thus stated by Justice (later Chief Justice) Hoke: “To establish actionable negligence, the question of contributory negligence being out of the case, the plaintiff is required to show by the greater weight of the testimony, first, that there has been a failure to exercise proper care in the performance of some legal duty which the defendant owed the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Tysinger v. Coble Dairy ProductsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Pittsburgh Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Bondurant v. MastinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Kellogg v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Dinkins v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Barnes v. CaulbourneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.