Congdon v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Case by Susan Congdon against the Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff upon a verdict -directed by the court. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The plaintiff was injured in a head-on collision between two cars of the defendant company, in the county of Washtenaw, in this State. The dispatching of the cars was done by telephone. The dispatcher, who had control of the section of the road where the accident occurred, had his office in Ypsilanti. The trains which collided were No. 108, with conductor Balcom and motorman Clark, going west from Ypsilanti, and No. 109, conductor Clark and motorman Hudnut, going east from Jackson. The orders are given to the motorman and conductor of each train by the dispatcher, who writes the order at the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sewell v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Dolph v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Howell v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Stoody v. Detroit, Grand Rapids & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Mirabile v. Simon J. Murphy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burghardt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Pattinson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Harris v. BernsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Laxton v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Higdon v. CarlebachMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.