Legal Opinion

Laxton v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1944No. 9712PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Action for damages for personal injuries. Appeal by plaintiff’from a directed verdict for defendant at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. The sole question is, whether appellee’s motion for a- directed verdict should have been denied.

Appellant was a “plant protection patrolman”-at the Mt. Hope plant of the Nash-* Kelvinator Corporation at Lansing, Mich, (herein called Nash). Shortly after he went on duty at midnight, on April 16, 1942, he was struck on the head and severely injured by a falling exterior floodlight fixture weighing 37% pounds. The fixture fell about 50…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barnowsky v. HelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Burghardt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Frye v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Alpern v. ChurchillMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Weissert v. City of EscanabaMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API