Legal Opinion

Agostino v. Rockwell Manufacturing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 297PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion to remove a compulsory nonsuit. The action was initiated in trespass and assumpsit, but before trial appellant elected to proceed solely on the theory of strict liability enunciated in §402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts.

The Act of March 11, 1875, P.L. 6, §1, as amended June 3, 1971, P.L. 118, No. 6, §1 (§509(a) (25)), 12 P.S. §645, allows an order for compulsory nonsuit to be entered when plaintiff’s evidence is insufficient to maintain his cause of action. It provides:

“Whenever the defendant, upon the trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Bialek v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Ferraro v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Cornell Drilling Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Gill v. McGraw Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Dansak v. Cameron Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Ducko v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API