Legal Opinion

MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1969No. Appeal, 88PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaulding, J.,

This is an appeal by Ford Motor Company, appellant, from a judgment entered upon a verdict for appellees Frank H. and Anne MacDougall. Appellant contends the court below erred in denying a motion for judgment n.o.v.

On April 17, 1962, a 1962 Comet station wagon owned and driven by appellees was involved in an accident on the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Appellees brought a trespass action against appellant, the manufacturer, and Thompson Lincoln Mercury Company, the retail seller, to recover property damage.

At trial, appellees presented only the deposition of Mrs. MaeDougall…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Cintrone v. Hertz Truck Leasing & Rental ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Cassisi v. Maytag Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API