Dansak v. Cameron Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:
In this ease, we hold that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment to defendants based on the “spoliation of evidence” doctrine. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to appellee Cameron Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Inc. (“Cameron”) at No. 1372 Pittsburgh 1995. We also reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to appel-lee Owens-Brockway Glass Containers, Inc., formerly known as Owens-Illinois Glass Containers, Inc. (“Owens”) at No. 1285 Pittsburgh 1995.1
The facts of the case are drawn from appellant Wilma Dansak’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,170 Generoso Perez-Trujillo v. Volvo Car Corporation (Sweden)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Barnish v. KWI Building Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.