Legal Opinion

Ferraro v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1966No. Appeal, 167PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

William G. Ferraro instituted this action of trespass to recover damages for loss resulting from a unique automobile accident. The named defendants were the Ford Motor Company (Ford) and the Toohey Motor Company (Toohey). Since Toohey, a corporation, had been dissolved, service was never effected on this defendant. Ford was properly served, and the action proceeded against it alone.

After trial, the jury awarded the plaintiff the sum of $107,851. Ford filed motions for a new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The lower court granted the latter motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Skoda v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Smith v. United News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Draper v. Airco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Henderson v. Ford Motor CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API