Cornell Drilling Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Judge:
This appeal presents the question of whether appellant introduced sufficient evidence to have the issue of liability based on § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) 1 submitted to the jury. The court below held that appellant’s evidence was deficient and entered a compulsory nonsuit in favor of appellees at the conclusion of appellant’s case. We disagree with this decision and remand for a new trial.
Appellant’s complaint in trespass alleged inter alia the following facts: On August 12,1968, appellant purchased from Null Ford Sales, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Bialek v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Mary Vizzini, Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Vizzini, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company C/o C. T. Corp. SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- REM Coal Co., Inc. v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Shreve v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Majdic v. Cincinnati MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.