Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a summary judgment granted to plaintiff upon the pleadings and stipulated facts.
This action was initiated by plaintiff’s petition asking for declaratory relief adjudging Ex. Sess. L. 1957, c. 4 1 (hereinafter referred to as the Reimbursement Act), to be constitutional, and further praying for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, as commissioner of highways for the State of Minnesota, (a) to ascertain, as required by said act, the cost of relocating plaintiff’s utility facilities, (b) to certify the cost thereof to the Bureau of Public…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- City of Worcester v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Appalachian Power Co. v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
- Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.