Legal Opinion

State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1933No. 29,213PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Mandamus, the city of St. Paul as relator appealing from an order sustaining respondent’s- general demurrer to petition and alternative writ.

Under the St. Paul charter the city council has general control of public parkways and highways in the city. Respondent’s railroad tracks cross Wheelock Parkway, near the northerly limits of *163the city and about midway between Como and Phalen Parks, on what is considered a temporary, wooden trestle. February 10, 1914, by ordinance, the city council directed the construction of a permanent bridge by respondent at its own expense. But, upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Wells-Dickey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Wells-Dickey Trust Co. v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. City of St. Paul v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. M. St. P. S. S. M. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Soo Line Railroad v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API