In Re Vaughan
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This proceeding was instituted in the superior court of Los Angeles County by the Los Angeles Bar Association to secure the disbarment of Arthur C. Vaughan, an attorney, who was charged with violating his oath as attorney and with the commission of acts involving moral turpitude, dishonesty and corruption. The cause having been heard, it was adjudged that the accused be disbarred, his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently deprived of the right to practice as an attorney or counselor in the courts of this state. Prom that judgment this appeal is taken.
Three…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Charges of Association of the Bar v. RandelNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- In re WellcomeMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- In re HaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In re WellcomeMontana Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Cramer v. TyarsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.