City of Wichita v. Eisenring
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
Through eminent domain, the City of Wichita (City) acquired 75.9 acres of real estate owned by Victor B. and Johnnie B. Eisenring. The City appeals from the jury determination of market value, claiming that the award was based upon expert testimony erroneously admitted without adequate foundation and, further, improperly based upon consideration of personalty located on the Eisenring property. We affirm.
Victor and Johnnie Eisenring, husband and wife, owned a 75.9 acre tract of land which the City sought to acquire by eminent domain in order…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- State v. MonclaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- United States v. WhitehurstCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- McCubbin Ex Rel. McCubbin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- City of Mission Hills v. SextonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Butler County Rural Water District No. 8 v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Dieker v. Case Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.