Legal Opinion

City of Harlingen v. Estate of Sharboneau

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2001No. 99-1118PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

joined by Justice HECHT, Justice OWEN, Justice ABBOTT, and Justice JEFFERSON.

The sole issue in this condemnation case is whether the condemnee’s valuation evidence is admissible. The condemnor, the City of Harlingen, contends that the trial court erred in admitting testimony from the landowner’s expert based on an appraisal method described as subdivision development analysis. Under this approach, the witness estimated the land’s gross value as if it were subdivided for residential development, then discounted this value for the estimated costs of development. Based on the expert’s testimony,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. United States v. 50 Acres of LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Exxon Pipeline Co. v. ZwahrTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. KraftTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Houston Unlimited, Inc. Metal Processing v. Mel Acres RanchTexas Supreme Court · 2014

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API