Legal Opinion

Dieker v. Case Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 25, 2003No. 86,429PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brazil, J.:

Douglas Dieker and Thomas (Tom) Dieker (plaintiffs) purchased a new Case combine which caught fire after 12 days of use during soybean harvest. In the jury trial against defendant Case Corporation (Case), plaintiffs presented a breach of implied warranty claim and the jury awarded them $96,344.35 in damages. The trial court denied Case’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, a new trial. Case appealed, contending that the district court erred by permitting plaintiffs’ expert witness to testify concerning the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Black v. Don Schmid Motor, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. State v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hodges v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Pullen v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Pritchett v. Cottrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. O'Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API