Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
This was an action for damages commenced by the plaintiff-appellants, Frank J. Casey, and Freda J. Casey, his wife, against the Phillips Pipeline Company and the Sheehan Pipeline Company, for the destruction of a crop of zoysia grass, the loss of marine life in the plaintiffs’ pond or small lake, the filling of the lake, and loss of alfalfa and bluegrass in Phillips Pipeline right of way. The plaintiffs have appealed from orders of the district court sustaining separate motions to dismiss their cause of action.
The plaintiffs are the owners…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Evans v. MoseleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Laffery v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Betts v. Southern California Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. FlinchpaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Hampton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.