Legal Opinion

City of Mission Hills v. Sexton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 22, 2007No. 97,151PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

In this condemnation proceeding, the jury awarded landowners Ronald and Felicia Sexton $10,900 for the temporary partial taking of their property, via two easements, by the City of Mission Hills (City) for a sewer rehabilitation project. The Sextons contend that the trial court abused its discretion by denying their motion for a new trial. In raising this contention, they specifically argue that, in calculating the amount of compensation, the jury’s verdict was contrary to the evidence presented at trial and contrary to Kansas condemnation…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. MortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1 v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. Kelly v. VinzantSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API