Legal Opinion

Harksen v. Peska

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoehr, Circuit Judge

[¶ 1.] The trial court found Gene Peska (Peska) in civil contempt of court and entered a specific permanent injunction. Peska appeals. We affirm, in part, and reverse and remand, in part.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] This matter has been before this Court on a previous occasion. Harksen v. Peska, 1998 SD 70, 581 N.W.2d 170. Additional facts are set forth in that opinion.

[¶ 3.] Peska purchased seven and one-half acres of land in a tract in the Black Hills. The entire tract was subject to restrictive covenants, which will expire in 2023. These covenants prohibited Peska from building a residence on his land.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Parisi v. Broward CountySupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re MBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. In re the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sazama v. State Ex Rel. MuilenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Brown v. Douglas School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Keller v. KellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hiller v. HillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Dejong v. DejongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API