Harksen v. Peska
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoehr, Circuit Judge
[¶ 1.] The trial court found Gene Peska (Peska) in civil contempt of court and entered a specific permanent injunction. Peska appeals. We affirm, in part, and reverse and remand, in part.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] This matter has been before this Court on a previous occasion. Harksen v. Peska, 1998 SD 70, 581 N.W.2d 170. Additional facts are set forth in that opinion.
[¶ 3.] Peska purchased seven and one-half acres of land in a tract in the Black Hills. The entire tract was subject to restrictive covenants, which will expire in 2023. These covenants prohibited Peska from building a residence on his land.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Parisi v. Broward CountySupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re MBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- In re the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sazama v. State Ex Rel. MuilenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Brown v. Douglas School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Keller v. KellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Hiller v. HillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Dejong v. DejongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.