Legal Opinion

Piechowski v. Case

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1977No. 12013PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

This case involves a restrictive covenant which is a part of a residential subdivision plat. To resolve the case we must interpret the covenant to determine whether certain uses now projected for the “Park and Commercial Area” of the plat by appellant sub-dividers violate the covenant and may be enjoined by respondents who are homeowners within the platted subdivision. We affirm the judgment granting respondents a permanent injunction.

In 1963 appellants 1 platted “Riverside Acres” as a residential subdivision, with six blocks containing a total of ninety-six lots, and a “Park…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thodos v. ShirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. Eberle v. McKeownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. City of Detroit v. TygardMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Newton v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hall v. Church of the Open BibleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Pure Plant Food International, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Subsurfco, Inc. v. B-Y Water DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Halls v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Harksen v. PeskaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Tinaglia v. IttzesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API