Cotton v. Manning
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[¶ 3.] MILLER, Chief Justice (on reassignment),
who would affirm the trial court on all issues, writes the majority opinion on Issue 1, which holds the trial court properly granted summary judgment dismissing an associate attorney’s claims against her employer for post-termination compensation.
FACTS
[¶ 4.] In December 1994 Nancy Manning hired Rose Cotton to work as an associate in Manning’s law office in Rapid City, South Dakota. On January 3, 1995, both parties signed a one-year employment contract, which was to be renewed automatically unless thirty days’ notice was given to the other party.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Campion v. Parkview ApartmentsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Singpiel v. MorrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Production Credit Ass'n of the Midlands v. WynneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Kimball Investment Land, Ltd. v. ChmelaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Stern Oil Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Bunkers v. JacobsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Picardi v. ZimmiondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.