Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 7, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0896PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lindsay Jenkins (“Plaintiff’), a citizen of the United Kingdom who is proceeding pro se, commenced the above-captioned civil action on June 1, 2012 against sixteen named defendants, asserting Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and sexual discrimination and harassment claims in connection with mortgage foreclosure litigation in Florida state court. On December 12, 2012, Plaintiff also filed a Notice of Lis Pendens, purporting to put all defendants named in her civil action, and any interested third…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thomas v. WilkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Sibley v. RobertsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Borda v. Executive Office for the United States AttorneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Jenkins v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Doe v. Administrative Office of the U.S. CourtsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.